Glendon Rusch has made an excellent case in his last three starts that the best use of his skills might be as a long man out of the pen and occasional spot-starter. It helps that, even if Sergio Mitre and his Magic Groundball Machine aren't to be counted on in the long term, Jerome Williams is around to pick up the slack.
My desires at this point are likely contrary to what the team will actually do, but here's my admittedly ire-induced idea of how to arrange the staff once Wood and Prior return:
Move Rusch to the pen to mostly be the long man, but face the occasional tough group of lefties.
Move Mitre to the pen to handle some longer duty as well, but also to come in for situations where a groundball is needed. The issue here is whether he gets enough work to keep the sinker sinking, but I'm willing to experiment given the other available option.
That other option being Joe Borowski, God love him, who should be evacuated for his own safety. I fear the man is simply done, and it would be best to let him try to figure some stuff out in Iowa or go to another team rather than continue to get tagged the way he has of late.
Allow Williams to be the fifth starter. I have an irrational liking for the kid, but something tells me he's the best choice to permanently install in that spot.
Up to this point, I think the club and I might actually be on the same page - I imagine a lot depends on Mitre's start against the White Sox today - but I have a feeling that this next point is where the Cubs and I part ways:
Mike Remlinger should just go away. Not only has he been lousy of late - allowing runs in three of his last four appearances, while in the one game where he wasn't charged with a run, allowing two inherited runners to score when he gave up a double to the first man he faced - but he's been mediocre and unreliable during his entire tenure with the Cubs.
If there is a poster-child in the organization for why Jim Hendry's original approach to bullpen building was a bad idea, it's Sling Blade and the uninspiring work he's done during his time in Chicago, all while getting paid ridiculous sums for simply being old and left-handed.
What will happen instead is Rich Hill will be sent down to Iowa - perhaps as early as this Sunday when Prior's likely activated - and really, that's not such a bad thing. If he gets more time to work on his stuff - particularly learning to spot his fastball better so that hitters can't simply ignore his vicious curveball - that's a net positive for him, as I'm not sure he's ready to consistently face Major League hitters, and he may not get much work in The Show anyway.
However, at this point I'm just sick of the ache I get in the pit of my stomach every time I see Remlinger trot out from the pen. He's a constant reminder that you can't buy bullpen competence, and I've simply reached the limits of my patience for what he brings to a game.
Yes, it's probably better long term to stick Rem in the back of the pen and let Rich Hill get his work in down on the farm, but I still rankle at Remlinger being allowed to remain with the team when he so distinctly lacks the merits to stay.
The real answer is, of course, to do both - cut the staff back to a more reasonable eleven pitchers, send Hill to Iowa and Remlinger wherever, and bring up another bat - say, Ben Grieve - to bolster the bench. But not even I am delusional enough to think that would ever happen.
Without violating the anonymity of the web, I had the pleasure of sharing a Sox game with you, Scott, and Will last month. Declining my offer of a ride was pure genius. It took me an hour and forty minutes to get home.
About the Cubs, it would be fascinating to catalogue the Cubs bullpen free-agent signings and trades over the past ten years. Remlinger is just the most recent example, except for Hawkins. Who doesn't remember Mel Rojas? Matt Karchner? Alf? And yet, cheap success stories like Borowski and Rusch don't seem to have penetrated the collective brain of the organization. Why pay for a bad bullpen when you can get one for free?
Seriously, the ol' Cubbies are hurting not having a true leadoff guy. Can you imaging how unbeatable they'd be if we had a .333+ OBP guy batting in front of DLee?
Opposing pitchers would be literally horrified at the top of the lineup. For now, they only dread the middle of the lineup.
Everyone would benefit from him moving orgs: I really think a change of scenery would knock him out of his slump, the drunk Cubs fans would have to find someone else to boo, and our Cubbies could have someone batting leadoff who doesn't strike out all the time.
I'm psyched about Kotsay... I hope rumors are true and that he's the answer to the leadoff riddle.
Yeah, I found myself doing the same thing. Then I noticed the byline and had a sudden urge to shower.
rynox,
I don't know if Patterson would be part of that deal or not - it was implied that he might just move over to left - especially since I'm not sure the A's would want him. I imagine most of the discussion going on at this point is just how much the club is willing to cough up to get a deal done, and honestly, I don't know what the answer is.
However, I can't believe that a deal between Beane and Hendry could happen without throwing another 17 teams or so into the mix, so it should be interesting, if nothing else.
Lefty (if that is your real name ;-) ),
Sorry about the commuting hell. Frankly, that was a huge part of my logic - nothing like getting out of a ballgame near rush hour to make one appreciate public transportation.
The free agent retrospective is an interesting idea. I'll have to store that away for the offseason (just not enough time at the moment), and maybe start gathering data now. That could be kinda fun.
To comment, please log in.
Not a member? Register!