Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Write Derek at drksmart @ gmail.com
Write Phil at phil.bencomo @ gmail.com
There's not much going on this morning, so here's a link to a little puff piece in the Daily Herald about Scott McClain. While naturally designed this way, the article makes him seems like a good guy who's happy to be where he's at, and content with himself in general. Makes me want to root for him all the more, which is what pieces like that are supposed to do.
I can't just leave it at that, though, and in the spirit of further inquiry (and wasting time on a Friday morning) I thought to myself, "If I were to purchase a 2005 home jersey with McClain's number on it, and no name, what other former Cubs might people think I was associating my fandom with?"
Well, I looked around, and McClain is wearing number 9, so thanks to baseball-almanac.com I was able to compile a (hopefully complete) list in reverse chronological order of players who had worn that number since 1932 (the last year they have jersey numbers for).
Paul Bako
Todd Hundley
Damon Buford
Benito Santiago
Scott Servais
Matt Walbeck
Damon Berryhill
Butch Benton
Larry Cox
Tim Blackwell
Joe Wallis
Steve Swisher
Randy Hundley
Cuno Barragan
Jim Hegan
Del Rice
Bobby Thompson
Gordon Massa
Bob Lennon
Hank Sauer
Rube Novotney
Chico Hernandez
Hank Leiber
Frank Demaree
Gabby Hartnet
Mark Koenig
Rogers Hornsby
There are a couple of good names on there - Randy Hundley, Bobby Thompson, Hank Sauer, Gabby Hartnet, Rogers Hornsby - but for the most part, it's a rogue's gallery of unfortunates and "who's that?"'s, which is due in part to the fact that over much of that time the number 9 was used almost exclusively for catchers, many of them second or third stringers.
So, good luck with your new number and new home, Scott. And if you're going to emulate one of your similarly integered predecessors during your stay, take a look at the list above, and please, choose wisely.
Here's the problem I have with Scott McClain. While I'm sure he's a great guy, he's 33 years old (he was the third oldest player in the starting lineup today--behind Maddux and Burnitz) and is hardly the future of the organization. His presence simply means that Dusty has one more player who can take the place of a younger player and steal those valuable at-bats from the guys who need experience at the major league level (and also lets Dusty play another over-30 player while arguing that he's playing rookies).
Dusty wants to finish the season at .500. He wants this simply because he wants to appear like he's doing a satisfactory job. I could care less about a .500 record. As far as I'm concerned, if you're out of the playoff hunt (which they are), then the only thing 81-81 gets you is a worse draft pick next April. Play the kids, evaluate your talent, find your holes for next year.
I hear talk about Ronny Cedeno moving to second base to make room for a free agent shortstop. What better time to play him there than now? The games don't count for anything (except Dusty's contract incentives) and you can watch his performance against major league hitters and see if he can make the transition. Jermaine Van Buren is the closer of the future? Let him close some games. Let Rich Hill start some more games (God knows he'd be better than Glendon Rusch in the role) and let him get comfortable in the league. Ditto Matt Murton.
If you aren't preparing for the playoffs, then September is the month where you look toward the future. Show me the future.
He also only plays first and third, which are positions the Cubs don't have young players at, and in fact, have stars under contract to play. They've also not had any useful bench parts, especially who could spell Lee or Ramirez. If McClain shows he might be able to do that next year, I'm all for it, no matter what his age.
As for playing the kids the rest of the way, I'm all for that. I'd love to see what Cedeno and Murton would do, especially, and I think the organization truly needs to. McClain's not part of that problem, though.
"Didn't Henry Blanco and Jody Gerut both wear 9 on their backs this year?"
Hmmm. Maybe. The almanac didn't have numbers for this year yet, and the Cubs' site only has current numbers. Oh. And my memory for those things stinks. I'd need to look up the numbers of most of the Cubs players, even some of the more prominant ones. It's one of my many personal curses.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.